<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can We Believe the Polls?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southsidescholar.com/2008/10/01/can-we-believe-the-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southsidescholar.com/2008/10/01/can-we-believe-the-polls/</link>
	<description>... Ramblings from a South Side Grad Student</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.southsidescholar.com/2008/10/01/can-we-believe-the-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southsidescholar.com/http:/www.southsidescholar.com/blog#comment-10</guid>
		<description>hi alex&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;ve really enjoyed reading your blog so far this election.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One big reason why I think most people interested in American politics are predicting an Obama victory is the Senator&#039;s performance, relative to polling, in the primaries and caucuses. Belying the erstwhile &quot;Bradley effect&quot;, Obama&#039;s vote share exceeded, on average, the predictions of pre-election polling. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The relative extent of this effect seems to be related to the racial composition of different states, and the challenges pollsters had in predicting who would comprise the eventual turnout. A clear explanation of this claim is here http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/04/reverse-bradley-effect-fact-or-fiction.html&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, when we conflate polls&#039; underestimation of Obama&#039;s true support with the myriad structural advantages he possesses, it suggests it&#039;s a very speculative year to back the gop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi alex</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve really enjoyed reading your blog so far this election.</p>
<p>One big reason why I think most people interested in American politics are predicting an Obama victory is the Senator&#8217;s performance, relative to polling, in the primaries and caucuses. Belying the erstwhile &#8220;Bradley effect&#8221;, Obama&#8217;s vote share exceeded, on average, the predictions of pre-election polling. </p>
<p>The relative extent of this effect seems to be related to the racial composition of different states, and the challenges pollsters had in predicting who would comprise the eventual turnout. A clear explanation of this claim is here <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/04/reverse-bradley-effect-fact-or-fiction.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/04/reverse-bradley-effect-fact-or-fiction.html</a></p>
<p>So, when we conflate polls&#8217; underestimation of Obama&#8217;s true support with the myriad structural advantages he possesses, it suggests it&#8217;s a very speculative year to back the gop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

